From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT ASHLAND
Feb 15, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-11-DLB-EBA (E.D. Ky. Feb. 15, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-11-DLB-EBA

02-15-2017

BILLY E. BARKER PLAINTIFF v. DR. TIMOTHY LAW DEFENDANT


JUDGMENT

*****************

Consistent with the Order Adopting Report and Recommendation entered today, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 56) is adopted as the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the Court;

(2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 46) is granted;

(3) Plaintiff's claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are dismissed with prejudice, and Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant; and

(4) This matter is hereby stricken from the Court's active docket.

This 15th day of February, 2017.

Signed By:

David L . Bunning

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barker v. Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT ASHLAND
Feb 15, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-11-DLB-EBA (E.D. Ky. Feb. 15, 2017)
Case details for

Barker v. Law

Case Details

Full title:BILLY E. BARKER PLAINTIFF v. DR. TIMOTHY LAW DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT ASHLAND

Date published: Feb 15, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-11-DLB-EBA (E.D. Ky. Feb. 15, 2017)

Citing Cases

Paul v. Whitley Cnty. Det. Ctr.

("[Plaintiffs] did not address defendants' claims of entitlement to qualified immunity. These plaintiffs did…