From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barilla v. Meredith Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 2, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this defamation action alleging that defendant, a Syracuse television station, had falsely reported on the 6:00 P.M. news that plaintiff had been charged with rape. Supreme Court erred in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment. Defendant met its initial burden of showing that the broadcast did not contain the words alleged by plaintiff, thereby shifting the burden to plaintiff to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). The unsworn statements submitted by plaintiff do not constitute evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to defeat the motion (see, Grasso v. Angerami, 79 N.Y.2d 813; Simms v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 192 A.D.2d 700, 701; Briggs v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 190 A.D.2d 1047, 1048-1049).


Summaries of

Barilla v. Meredith Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1996
224 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Barilla v. Meredith Corporation

Case Details

Full title:FRANK BARILLA, Respondent, v. MEREDITH CORPORATION, Doing Business as WTVH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 831

Citing Cases

Piazza v. D'Anna

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendants Daniel E. Chamberland, Eugene Chamberland…

Lehigh Constr. Group v. Almquist, C.P.A

Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition. The unsworn statements of an accountant…