Barger v. Gipson

Full title: GARY DALE BARGER aka GARY FRANCIS FISHER, Plaintiff, v. GIPSON, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2015

1:15-cv-00055-LJO-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2015)

Opinion

GARY DALE BARGER aka GARY FRANCIS FISHER, Plaintiff, v. GIPSON, Defendant. No. 1:15-cv-00055-LJO-SKO (PC) United States District Court, Eastern District of California January 14, 2015

          ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G) (DOC. 1)

          LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         Plaintiff Gary Dale Barger aka Gary Francis Fisher, # F85263, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 12, 2015. Plaintiff is subject to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), which provides that "[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury."¹

1 Plaintiff has at least three dismissals which qualify as final strikes under section 1915(g). Silva. The Court takes judicial notice of the following United States District Court cases: Barger aka Fisher v. FBI, et al, l:13-cv-00414-LJO-SAB (E.D.Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim on Jul. 26, 2013); Barger aka Fisher v. FBI, et al, l:13-cv-00535-DLB (E.D.Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim on Nov. 21, 2013); and Fisher v. Bivens, 6 Unknown Agents, et al, 2:14-cv-01439-UA(MAN) (C.D.Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim on Mar. 6, 2014).

         The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs complaint and his allegations do not satisfy the imminent danger exception to section 1915(g).² Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1055-56 (9th Cir. 2007). If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this action, he must first pay the $400.00 filing fee.

2 Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at the California Health Care Facility in Stockton. Plaintiff's allegations concern events which occurred at California State Prison-Corcoran approximately four years ago, and his complaint presents no allegations that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

         Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice to re-filing accompanied by the $400.00 filing fee.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.