From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barger v. CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 22, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-0073 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-0073 KJM KJN P

06-22-2015

GARY DALE BARGER, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed May 19, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to pay the appropriate filing fees within twenty-one days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-one day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: June 22, 2015

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
/barg0073.fifp


Summaries of

Barger v. CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 22, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-0073 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2015)
Case details for

Barger v. CDCR

Case Details

Full title:GARY DALE BARGER, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 22, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-0073 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2015)