From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barfield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 15, 1932
121 Tex. Crim. 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932)

Opinion

No. 15203.

Delivered May 11, 1932. Rehearing Denied June 15, 1932. Reported in 50 S.W.2d 826.

Forgery — Statement of Facts — Bills of Exception.

Statement of facts and bills of exception filed too late will not be considered.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Tarrant County. Tried below before the Hon. George E. Hosey, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for passing a forged instrument; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Pat L. Pittman, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Conviction is for passing a forged instrument, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given on October 31, 1931. Sixty days were granted in which to file statement of facts and bills of exception. No further extension order appears in the record. If any had been made the time could not have been carried beyond ninety days from the date notice of appeal was given. Article 760, C. C. P. The statement of facts and bills of exception were filed in the trial court on January 30, 1932, which was ninety-one days after notice of appeal. Under the statute neither the statement of facts nor bills of exception may be considered. Many cases will be found collated in note 36, under article 760, Vernon's Ann. Tex. C. C. P. Some of the later cases are McKneely v. State, 110 Tex.Crim. Rep., 10 S.W.2d 544; Owens v. State, 117 Tex.Crim. Rep., 35 S.W.2d 726; Moore v. State (Texas Crim. App.), 37 S.W.2d 746; Loyd v. State, 118 Tex. Crim. 297, 38 S.W.2d 1102.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Barfield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 15, 1932
121 Tex. Crim. 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932)
Case details for

Barfield v. State

Case Details

Full title:F. K. BARFIELD v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 15, 1932

Citations

121 Tex. Crim. 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932)
50 S.W.2d 826

Citing Cases

Pena v. State

It may not be improper to here call the trial court's attention to the procedure to be pursued in case the…

Boatcallie v. State

Delivered May 11, 1932. Rehearing Denied June 15, 1932. Reported in 50 S.W.2d 826.1. — Intoxicating Liquor —…