From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barfield v. Lewis

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 4, 2024
2:21-cv-01099-RAJ-TLF (W.D. Wash. Apr. 4, 2024)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01099-RAJ-TLF

04-04-2024

CRAIG BARFIELD, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH D LEWIS, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Richard A. Jones United States District Judge

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Judge Theresa L. Fricke, United States Magistrate Judge, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff's motion for appointment of a forensic video expert (Dkt. 90) and plaintiff's motion requesting the Court's assistance in serving a subpoena (Dkt. 92) are DENIED.

(3) Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 85) is GRANTED as to plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim for physical conduct inside plaintiff's cell that plaintiff alleged was retaliatory. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 85) is DENIED as to plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim for alleged statements and verbal conduct that may have occurred outside plaintiff's cell that plaintiff alleged was retaliatory.

(4) The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the parties and the Hon. Theresa L. Fricke.


Summaries of

Barfield v. Lewis

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 4, 2024
2:21-cv-01099-RAJ-TLF (W.D. Wash. Apr. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Barfield v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG BARFIELD, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH D LEWIS, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Apr 4, 2024

Citations

2:21-cv-01099-RAJ-TLF (W.D. Wash. Apr. 4, 2024)