From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barela v. Stockton Police Dep't

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 24, 2023
2:22-cv-01209 TLN DB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01209 TLN DB P

03-24-2023

OSCAR BARELA, Plaintiff, v. STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed January 23, 2023, the court found plaintiff's complaint failed to state a claim and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The time granted has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Barela v. Stockton Police Dep't

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 24, 2023
2:22-cv-01209 TLN DB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Barela v. Stockton Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR BARELA, Plaintiff, v. STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 24, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01209 TLN DB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)