From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barden v. Union for Reform Judaism

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 10, 2015
134 A.D.3d 1274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

12-10-2015

In the Matter of the Claim of Douglas E. BARDEN, Appellant.Union for Reform Judaism, Respondent.Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Douglas E. Barden, Ridgefield, Connecticut, appellant pro se. Kane Kessler, P.C., New York City (Robert L. Sacks of counsel), for Union for Reform Judaism, respondent. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.


Douglas E. Barden, Ridgefield, Connecticut, appellant pro se.

Kane Kessler, P.C., New York City (Robert L. Sacks of counsel), for Union for Reform Judaism, respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 16, 2014, which ruled, among other things, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Decision affirmed. No opinion.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

LAHTINEN, J.P., GARRY, ROSE and DEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barden v. Union for Reform Judaism

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 10, 2015
134 A.D.3d 1274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Barden v. Union for Reform Judaism

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Douglas E. BARDEN, Appellant.Union for…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 10, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 1274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 9155
19 N.Y.S.3d 919