From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bard v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 23, 2012
1:12-CV-0022-NT (D. Me. Oct. 23, 2012)

Opinion

1:12-CV-0022-NT

10-23-2012

BARRY R. BARD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed September 28, 2012, the Recommended Decision is affirmed.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's final decision is AFFIRMED and judgment is entered in favor of the Commissioner.

Nancy Torresen

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bard v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 23, 2012
1:12-CV-0022-NT (D. Me. Oct. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Bard v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BARRY R. BARD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

1:12-CV-0022-NT (D. Me. Oct. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

Ryder v. Colvin

The plaintiff's first argument fails because the plaintiff has not shown prejudice or unfairness, and,…

Knudsen v. Colvin

Here, the plaintiff does not cite any record evidence that she ever made such an assertion. See Bard v.…