From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barcroft v. Paul Winston Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 15, 1961
178 N.E.2d 598 (Ohio 1961)

Opinion

No. 37222

Decided November 15, 1961.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Sale of summer theatrical production business — Bulk Sales Law — Applicability.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County.

Mr. Emanuel Nadlin, for appellants.

Messrs. Harshman, Young, Colvin Alexander and Mr. George Ruble, for appellees.


The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

ZIMMERMAN, acting C.J., RADCLIFF, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.

ZIMMERMAN, J., sitting in the place and stead of WEYGANDT, C.J.

RADCLIFF, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of ZIMMERMAN, J.


Summaries of

Barcroft v. Paul Winston Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 15, 1961
178 N.E.2d 598 (Ohio 1961)
Case details for

Barcroft v. Paul Winston Co.

Case Details

Full title:BARCROFT, D.B.A. BARCROFT ADVERTISING AGENCY, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. PAUL…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 15, 1961

Citations

178 N.E.2d 598 (Ohio 1961)
172 Ohio St. 487