From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barbosa v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-00275-SKO (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-00275-SKO

05-02-2013

CHRISTINA BARBOSA and PATRICIA AGUILLERA BARRIOS, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, v. CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP., and DOES 1-50, Defendants.

Kitty Szeto Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHRISTINA BARBOSA and PATRICIA AGUILLERA BARRIOS MECKLER BULGER TILSON MARICK & PEARSON LLP Jeremy Glenn Attorneys for Defendant CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP.


Hon. Sheila K. Oberto


JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE FINAL

APPROVAL MOTIONS;

DECLARATION OF KITTY SZETO;

ORDER THEREON


ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL

STATEMENT


Date: June 5, 2013


Complaint Filed: February 16, 2011

Trial Date: Not Set

Pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 144, Plaintiffs Christina Barbosa and Patricia Aguilera Barrios ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. ("Defendant") hereby submit this joint request for an additional five (5) days to file their Joint Motion for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement ("Final Approval Motion") and Plaintiffs' Motion for Final Approval of Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Enhancement Award ("Fee Motion").

Pursuant to the Court's Implementation Schedule (Doc. No. 56), the Final Approval Motion and Fee Motion are due for filing on May 1, 2013, with a hearing date five weeks thereafter on June 5, 2013. The parties have been diligently working on exchanging drafts of the motions for review, comment, and client approval. However, given that the last day for class members to submit a claim was April 15, 2013, there were claims received as late as April 30, 2013 (one day before the deadline to file the Final Approval Motion) and the parties need additional time to review and decide on the late claims filed. Moreover, the last day to object to the settlement was April 30, 2013, one day before the deadline to file the Final Approval Motion. As such, additional time will be necessary to ensure that objections, if any, are received, processed, and presented to the Court prior to the June 5, 2013, hearing.

No previous extensions of time have been requested by either party for the filing of these motions.

Neither side will be prejudiced by the extension of time because the final approval hearing is more than thirty (30) days away and the additional time will allow for the motions to be fully reviewed and approved by both sides without the need to file any opposition or reply thereto.

Accordingly, the Parties jointly request that the Court grant a five (5) day extension of time until May 6, 2013 for the filing of the Final Approval Motion and Fee Motion.

R. REX PARRIS LAW FIRM

THE DOWNEY LAW FIRM, LLC

Kitty Szeto

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CHRISTINA BARBOSA and PATRICIA

AGUILLERA BARRIOS

MECKLER BULGER TILSON MARICK &

PEARSON LLP

Jeremy Glenn

Attorneys for Defendant

CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORP.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' joint request, the deadline to submit the motions for final class settlement approval shall be continued to March 6, 2013.

The Court orders Plaintiffs to submit a statement regarding the applicability of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 133 S.Ct. 1426 (Mar. 27, 2013) to the certification of the settlement class in this case. This statement may be included in the motion for final approval, or it may be filed on or before May 15, 2013, as a supplemental statement in support of the motion for final approval of class settlement. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Barbosa v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-00275-SKO (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Barbosa v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINA BARBOSA and PATRICIA AGUILLERA BARRIOS, on behalf of themselves…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-00275-SKO (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)