From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 2, 2013
Case No.: 2:13-cv-00538-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Aug. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:13-cv-00538-GMN-CWH

08-02-2013

LARRY BARBER, Plaintiff, v. STEVE WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT &

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE

JUDGE C.W. HOFFMAN, JR.

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) of the Honorable C.W. Hoffman, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, entered July 8, 2013.

Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by July 25, 2013. No objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the Court has reviewed the record in this case and has determined that Magistrate Judge Hoffman's Recommendation should be ACCEPTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against all Defendants, Fourteenth Amendment claim against all Defendants, punitive damages claim against Metro, and claims against the individual defendants named in their official capacity are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice because Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and amendment would be futile.

____________

Gloria M. Navarro

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barber v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 2, 2013
Case No.: 2:13-cv-00538-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Aug. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Barber v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:LARRY BARBER, Plaintiff, v. STEVE WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 2, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:13-cv-00538-GMN-CWH (D. Nev. Aug. 2, 2013)