From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. Town of North Kingstown

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jan 6, 1977
117 R.I. 966 (R.I. 1977)

Opinion

M. P. No. 76-341.

January 6, 1977.

Plaintiffs have moved for a reconsideration of the vacation of the stay in this case on the basis of Tantimonaco v. Zoning Board of Johnston, 102 R.I. 594, 232 A.2d 385 (1967). Since that case is not applicable and the applicant for zoning change in this case is proceeding at its own risk, the motion for reconsideration is denied. This case is specially assigned to the calendar for February 11, 1977 for oral argument, at 9:30 a.m.

Hanson, Curran, Bowen Parks, A. Lauriston Parks, for petitioners.

Bernard F. McSally, Town Solicitor, Moore, Virgadamo, Boyle Lynch, Ltd. Francis J. Boyle (amicus curiae), Paul P. Pederzani, Jr. (amicus curiae), for respondents.


Summaries of

Barber v. Town of North Kingstown

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jan 6, 1977
117 R.I. 966 (R.I. 1977)
Case details for

Barber v. Town of North Kingstown

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM B. BARBER et al. v. TOWN OF NORTH KINGSTOWN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Jan 6, 1977

Citations

117 R.I. 966 (R.I. 1977)