From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. Cub Foods Store Dir.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 18, 2021
Case No. 21-CV-607 (NEB/DTS) (D. Minn. Jun. 18, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 21-CV-607 (NEB/DTS)

06-18-2021

WILLIE J. BARBER, Plaintiff, v. CUB FOODS STORE DIRECTOR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the April 30, 2021 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (ECF No. 9.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 9) is ACCEPTED; and

2. The claims against defendants Nicolodean Universe, Aramark Food Service, Target Center, Personnel Plus Jointly, Atlas Temp, Dolphin
3. Staffing, The Local, and Dollar Tree are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Dated: June 18, 2021

BY THE COURT:

s/Nancy E. Brasel

Nancy E. Brasel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barber v. Cub Foods Store Dir.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 18, 2021
Case No. 21-CV-607 (NEB/DTS) (D. Minn. Jun. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Barber v. Cub Foods Store Dir.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE J. BARBER, Plaintiff, v. CUB FOODS STORE DIRECTOR, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 18, 2021

Citations

Case No. 21-CV-607 (NEB/DTS) (D. Minn. Jun. 18, 2021)