From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barbar v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Jul 5, 2007
No. 14-06-00897-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 5, 2007)

Opinion

No. 14-06-00897-CR

Opinion filed July 5, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 248th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 647429.

Panel consists of Justices ANDERSON, FOWLER, and FROST.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This appeal is from the trial court's order of August 19, 2006, denying appellant's request for DNA testing in cause number 647429. Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). As of this date, more than sixty days have elapsed and no pro se response has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Barbar v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Jul 5, 2007
No. 14-06-00897-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Barbar v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES SAMUEL BARBAR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Jul 5, 2007

Citations

No. 14-06-00897-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 5, 2007)