From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barash v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1946
270 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

May 20, 1946.

Appeal from Kings County.


Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The right to a preference in a contract action accorded to a resident of Kings County may only be considered in respect of an action begun in the first instance as a matter of right in Kings County, and may not be considered when begun in disregard of section 182-b of the Civil Practice Act. Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barash v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1946
270 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Barash v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MAX BARASH et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of BARASH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Torres v. City of Geneva

However, the motion is denied, without costs, for these reasons: (1) There is no reasonable assurance that…