From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baptiste v. Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 8, 2013
No. 2:08-cv-1420 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-1420 KJM CKD P

04-08-2013

KENNETH E. BAPTISTE, Plaintiff, v. G. DUNN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a first amended civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 30, 2013, the district judge assigned to this case adopted the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations in full, granting in part, and denying in part defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiff now proceeds with Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Hopson and Simpson in their individual capacity and with injunctive relief claims against defendants Felker and Leo in their official capacity. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A), defendants have fourteen days after the entry of that ruling in which to file a responsive pleading. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT defendants shall file a responsive pleading to the first amended complaint on or before April 15, 2013.

_________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Baptiste v. Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 8, 2013
No. 2:08-cv-1420 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Baptiste v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH E. BAPTISTE, Plaintiff, v. G. DUNN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 8, 2013

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-1420 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)