From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Dec 15, 2016
S227473 (Cal. Dec. 15, 2016)

Opinion

S227473

12-15-2016

BANNING RANCH CONSERVANCY v. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH (NEWPORT BANNING RANCH, LLC)


G049691 Fourth Appellate District, Div. 3

Order filed

The joint request of counsel for defendants and appellants and Real Parties in Interest in the above-referenced cause to allow two counsel to argue on behalf of defendants and appellants and Real Parties in Interest at oral argument is hereby granted.

The joint request of defendants and appellants and Real Parties in Interest to allocate to Whitman F. Manley, counsel for City of Newport Beach et al., 20 minutes and Benjamin G. Shatz, counsel for Newport Banning Ranch, LLC et al., 10 minutes of defendants and appellants' 30-minute allotted time for oral argument is granted.


Summaries of

Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Dec 15, 2016
S227473 (Cal. Dec. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach

Case Details

Full title:BANNING RANCH CONSERVANCY v. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH (NEWPORT BANNING RANCH…

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Dec 15, 2016

Citations

S227473 (Cal. Dec. 15, 2016)