From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 8, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-393 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-393

01-08-2015

DAVID E. BANKS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #9), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and is not permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court also certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous. January 8, 2015

*/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Banks v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 8, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-393 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Banks v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID E. BANKS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jan 8, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-393 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2015)