From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Stratton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION
Jan 11, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-P120-JHM (W.D. Ky. Jan. 11, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-P120-JHM

01-11-2021

QWENTIN LAMAR BANKS PLAINTIFF v. JOSEPH STRATTON et al. DEFENDANTS

cc: Plaintiff, pro se


MEMORANDUM

By Order entered November 16, 2020 (DN 6), this Court ordered Plaintiff Qwentin Lamar Banks to complete and sign page 6 of the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint form. In doing so, the Court warned Plaintiff that failure to comply within the time allotted would result in dismissal of the instant action.

More than 30 days have passed since entry of that Order without compliance from Plaintiff. Courts have an inherent power "acting on their own initiative, to clear their calendars of cases that have remained dormant because of the inaction or dilatoriness of the parties seeking relief." Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962). Therefore, by separate Order, the Court will dismiss the instant action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (governing involuntary dismissal). Date: January 11, 2021

/s/

Joseph H. McKinley Jr., Senior Judge

United States District Court cc: Plaintiff, pro se
4414.009


Summaries of

Banks v. Stratton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION
Jan 11, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-P120-JHM (W.D. Ky. Jan. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Banks v. Stratton

Case Details

Full title:QWENTIN LAMAR BANKS PLAINTIFF v. JOSEPH STRATTON et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 11, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-P120-JHM (W.D. Ky. Jan. 11, 2021)