From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. N.Y. Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Feb 12, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv37 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv37

02-12-2015

FREDERICK BANKS, ET AL. v. NEW YORK POLICE DEP'T, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiffs Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the New York Police Department and others.

Plaintiffs filed this action as an "Indictmetn and Petition for Writ of Mandamus Complaint." Liberally interpreted, the plaintiffs' pleading is construed as a complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit complaining of the conditions of their confinement at the Renewal Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bailey, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1973).

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claims arose. Plaintiff's claims arose at the Renewal Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 118, Pittsburgh is located in the Western District of Pennsylvania. Accordingly, venue in the Eastern District of Texas is not proper.

When venue is not proper, the court "shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). This case should be transferred to the Western District of Pennsylvania. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the undersigned.

SIGNED this 12 day of February, 2015.

/s/_________

KEITH F. GIBLIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Banks v. N.Y. Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Feb 12, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv37 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Banks v. N.Y. Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BANKS, ET AL. v. NEW YORK POLICE DEP'T, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Feb 12, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv37 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2015)

Citing Cases

Banks v. N.Y. Police Dep't

See Mershon v. Beasely, 994 F.2d 449, 451 (8th Cir. 1993). Last, the Court takes judicial notice of two…