From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Huiet

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 23, 1965
142 S.E.2d 421 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)

Opinion

41256.

SUBMITTED APRIL 7, 1965.

DECIDED APRIL 23, 1965.

Unemployment compensation. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge McKenzie.

Preston L. Holland, for plaintiff in error.

Otis L. Hathcock, Fisher Phillips, C. Lash Harrison, contra.


In this case the claimant for benefits under the Employment Security Law (Ga. L. 1937, p. 806, as amended 1951, p. 512; Code Ann. § 54-601 et seq.), assigns error on the judgment of the superior court affirming the decision of the board of review that the claimant was disqualified for benefits under Section 5(c) of the Act ( Code Ann. § 54-610(c)) because she had refused to accept suitable work and that the claimant should not be eligible for benefits until she makes a showing of eligibility as provided by Section 4(c) of the Act ( Code Ann. § 54-609(c)) in that that she was available for work, had actively and in good faith sought employment and was actively and in good faith seeking employment and was bona fide in the labor market. The findings as to the facts and the decision of the board of review were supported by evidence. The superior court did not err, therefore, in affirming the decision of the board of review. Code Ann. § 54-619; Dalton Brick c. Co. v. Huiet, 102 Ga. App. 221 ( 115 S.E.2d 748); Huiet v. Wallace, 108 Ga. App. 208 ( 132 S.E.2d 523).

Judgment affirmed. Bell, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.

SUBMITTED APRIL 7, 1965 — DECIDED APRIL 23, 1965.


Summaries of

Banks v. Huiet

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 23, 1965
142 S.E.2d 421 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)
Case details for

Banks v. Huiet

Case Details

Full title:BANKS v. HUIET, Commissioner, et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 23, 1965

Citations

142 S.E.2d 421 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)
142 S.E.2d 421

Citing Cases

Phillips v. Caldwell

(Code § 54-615), and its determination of the case is a de novo proceeding. Dalton Brick c. Co. v. Huiet, 102…

Barnes v. Caldwell

Therefore, in reviewing orders of the superior court in appeals from decisions of the Employment Security…