From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2012
2:12-cv-00150-SWW-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 30, 2012)

Opinion

2:12-cv-00150-SWW-JTK

11-30-2012

FREDERICK BANKS, PLAINTIFF REG. #05711-068 v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Defendants's Summary Judgment Motion, together with Brief in Support and Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. Nos. 15-17). Plaintiff has not responded to the Motions.

At the summary judgment stage, a plaintiff cannot rest upon mere allegations and, instead, must meet proof with proof. See FED. R. CIV. P. 56(e). This means that Plaintiff's Response must include his legal arguments, as well as affidavits, prison records, or other evidence establishing that there is a genuine issue of material fact that must be resolved at a hearing or trial.

The affidavit must be based upon the personal knowledge of the person executing the affidavit and must be either: (1) sworn and subscribed to by a notary public; or (2) executed under penalty of perjury, as provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1746.

Furthermore, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, Plaintiff must also separately file a Statement of Disputed Facts, which lists: (a) any disagreement he has with the specifically numbered factual assertions contained in Defendants' Statements of Undisputed Facts (Doc. Nos. 23, 26); and (b) any other disputed facts that he believes must be resolved at a hearing or trial.

If Plaintiff disputes any of the facts set forth in Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Facts, he must identify each numbered paragraph that contains the facts he disputes and, for each paragraph, explain why he disputes those facts.
--------

Finally, Plaintiff is advised that if he intends to rely upon grievances or records that have been previously filed with the Court, he must specifically refer to those documents by docket number, page, date, and heading. The Court will not sift through the file to find support for Plaintiff's factual contentions. See Crossley v. Georgia-Pacific, Corp., 355 F.3d 1112, 1113-14 (8th Cir. 2004) (affirming the grant of summary judgment because a plaintiff failed to properly refer to specific pages of the record that supported his position).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff must file, within fifteen days of the entry of the Order, a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and separate Statements of Disputed Facts that comply with the FED. R. CIV. P. 56, Local Rule 56.1, and the instructions set forth in this Order.

2. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to timely and properly comply with this Order will result in: (a) all of the facts set forth in Defendant's summary judgment papers being deemed admitted by Plaintiff, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(c); or (b) the dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of November, 2012.

________

JEROME T. KEARNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Banks v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2012
2:12-cv-00150-SWW-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Banks v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BANKS, PLAINTIFF REG. #05711-068 v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2012

Citations

2:12-cv-00150-SWW-JTK (E.D. Ark. Nov. 30, 2012)