From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Attinello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 30, 2023
1:23-cv-00112-ADA-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00112-ADA-BAM (PC)

06-30-2023

ROBBIE BANKS, Plaintiff, v. VALERIE ATTINELLO, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE AND FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER (ECF NO. 9)

Plaintiff Robbie Banks (“Plaintiff”') is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On March 27, 2023, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee within twenty-one days after service to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 9 at 2.) Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, and the deadline for her to do so has expired. Plaintiff has not otherwise communicated with the Court regarding payment of the filing fee.

Because Plaintiff has failed to obey the Court's order and pay the appropriate filing fee, this case cannot proceed and will be dismissed. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly,

1. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's order and her failure to pay the filing fee; and
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Banks v. Attinello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 30, 2023
1:23-cv-00112-ADA-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Banks v. Attinello

Case Details

Full title:ROBBIE BANKS, Plaintiff, v. VALERIE ATTINELLO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 30, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00112-ADA-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2023)