From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fed. Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Moseley

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1932
202 N.C. 836 (N.C. 1932)

Opinion

(Filed 9 March, 1932.)

APPEAL by defendants from Devin, J., at November Term, 1931, of LENOIR.

Wallace White and Whitaker Allen for plaintiffs.

Rouse Rouse for defendants.


Civil action (1) to recover on two promissory notes, and (2) to set aside a deed alleged to have been executed by the defendants in fraud of the plaintiff's rights.

Demurrer interposed on the ground of misjoinder of parties and causes. Overruled; exception; appeal.


Affirmed on authority of Carswell v. Talley, 192 N.C. 37, 135 S.E. 181, Robinson v. Williams, 189 N.C. 256, 126 S.E. 621, Chemical Co. v. Floyd, 158 N.C. 455, 74 S.E. 465, LeDuc v. Brandt, 110 N.C. 289, 14 S.E. 778.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Fed. Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Moseley

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1932
202 N.C. 836 (N.C. 1932)
Case details for

Fed. Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Moseley

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND ET AL., v. L. C. MOSELEY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1932

Citations

202 N.C. 836 (N.C. 1932)
162 S.E. 924

Citing Cases

Refining Co. v. Bottling Co.

The conclusion reached in the Wall and Mebane cases has been consistently followed. Steel Corp v. Brinkley…

Hood, Commissioner of Banks v. Neal

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of Hood, Commissioner, v. Love, ante, 583, Trust Co. v. Peirce, 195 N.C.…