In Bank One Chicago, N.A. v. Midwest Bank Trust Co., ___ U.S. ___116 S.Ct. 637 (1996), the Supreme Court has agreed, reversing our decision in First Illinois and holding that the EFAA provides for federal court jurisdiction in suits between depository institutions.
Summary of this case from NED BANK v. STANDARD BANK AND TRUST CONo. 93-3251.
March 21, 1996.
N.D.Ill.; Remand from 116 S.Ct. 637.
CASE DISMISSED
In Bank One Chicago, N.A. v. Midwest Bank Trust Co., ___ U.S. ___116 S.Ct. 637 (1996), the Supreme Court has agreed, reversing our decision in First Illinois and holding that the EFAA provides for federal court jurisdiction in suits between depository institutions.
Summary of this case from NED BANK v. STANDARD BANK AND TRUST COFull title:Bank One Chicago, N.A. v. Midwest Bank Trust Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Date published: Mar 21, 1996
Both parties, NBD Bank and Standard Bank and Trust Co. ("Standard Bank"), appeal from the district court's…
Williams v. HeasthavenBut the court “in its discretion may choose to search the record for additional evidence” that supports a…