From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of Am. v. 37C Team, LLC

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Sep 30, 2022
No. 3D20-1464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 30, 2022)

Opinion

3D20-1464

09-30-2022

Bank of America, N.A., Petitioner, v. 37C Team, LLC, Respondent.

Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo and Adam J. Wick, for petitioner. Jacobs Legal, PLLC and Bruce Jacobs, for respondent.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County Lower Tribunal No. 19-34424 Spencer Eig, Judge.

Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo and Adam J. Wick, for petitioner.

Jacobs Legal, PLLC and Bruce Jacobs, for respondent.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LOBREE, JJ.

LOBREE, J.

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari and response thereto, we find that with respect to the discovery materials that are the subject of this petition, the trial court's order denying in part Bank of America's motion for protective order departs from the essential requirements of the law, thereby causing irreparable injury. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Figueroa, 299 So.3d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Rousso v. Hannon, 146 So.3d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); see also Bank of Am., N.A. v. BCML Holding, LLC, 319 So.3d 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021). Therefore, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order.

Petition granted; order quashed.


Summaries of

Bank of Am. v. 37C Team, LLC

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Sep 30, 2022
No. 3D20-1464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Bank of Am. v. 37C Team, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Bank of America, N.A., Petitioner, v. 37C Team, LLC, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Sep 30, 2022

Citations

No. 3D20-1464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 30, 2022)