From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baney v. Fisher

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 8, 2019
217 A.3d 189 (Pa. 2019)

Opinion

No. 43 MAP 2019

08-08-2019

Jeremy BANEY, Appellant v. Mike FISHER, Michael T. Madeira, Kevin Barr, Christopher Schmidt, and Josh Shapiro of the PA. Attorney General's Office, Russ Burcher of the PA. State Police, Appellees


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2019, the Notice of Appeal is quashed. The challenged order of the Commonwealth Court is interlocutory and not appealable as of right. See Pa.R.A.P. 341(b) (definition of a final order); 311 (Interlocutory Appeals as of Right). Nor does the order constitute a collateral order. See Pa.R.A.P. 313; In re Barnes Foundation, 582 Pa. 370, 871 A.2d 792, 794 (2005).


Summaries of

Baney v. Fisher

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 8, 2019
217 A.3d 189 (Pa. 2019)
Case details for

Baney v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY BANEY, Appellant v. MIKE FISHER, MICHAEL T. MADEIRA, KEVIN BARR…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 8, 2019

Citations

217 A.3d 189 (Pa. 2019)