BANE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

Full title: MICHAEL BANE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 18, 2010

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2798 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 18, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2798.

June 18, 2010

ORDER

JOEL SLOMSKY, District Judge

AND NOW, this 18^th day of June 2010, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Michael Bane's Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Richard Brehant, Anthony P. DiLacqua, Jeanette Lake Dooley, Benjamin Frazier, Daniel Gorman, David Harte, Lisa King, David Pinkerton, Charles H. Ramsey, the City of Philadelphia, and Robert Zielinski (City Defendants) (Doc. No. 29), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to City Defendants' Motion To Dismiss (Doc. No. 32), the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Eileen Bonner, Thomas Corbett, Charles Meissner, and Frank Pawlowksi (Commonwealth Defendants) (Doc. No. 34), and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Commonwealth Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 39), and after a complete and independent review of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 28) and the RICO Case Statement (Doc. No. 45), it is ORDERED as follows:

1. City Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 29) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; the Court will schedule a pre-trial conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 with Plaintiff and City Defendants as to the remaining counts.

2. Commonwealth Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 34) is GRANTED.

3. As to Commonwealth Defendants, Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety WITH PREJUDICE.