Summary
holding that the inmate's constitutional rights were not violated by the provision of "toothpowder" instead of toothpaste
Summary of this case from Lipsey v. MedinaOpinion
Editorial Note:
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
INS
DISMISSED.
Before: TANG, KOZINSKI, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from a district court order in August, 1990 awarding attorneys' fees to appellee. A limited remand for factual findings by the district court was issued in this case on March 10, 1992. Failing the diligent prosecution of the appeal since the date of the limited remand, it is ordered that this appeal is DISMISSED.