Opinion
Argued March 15, 1894
Decided April 10, 1894
Mark Ash for appellant.
Thomas McAdam for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Bamman v. Binzen
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 10, 1894
142 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1894)
Summaries of
Bamman v. Binzen
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 10, 1894
142 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for
Bamman v. Binzen
Case Details
Full title:FERDINAND C. BAMMAN, Appellant, v . THERESIA BINZEN, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 10, 1894
Citations
142 N.Y. 636 (N.Y. 1894)
60 N.Y. St. Rptr. 865
Citing Cases
Ocean Fifth Realty Corp. v. Stern
Such oral statement, aside from other legal informities, is too indefinite to have any binding effect. (See…
Ocean Fifth Realty Corp. v. SternSuch oral statement, aside from other legal informities, is too indefinite to have any binding effect. (See…