From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bamann v. Patel

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jun 9, 2010
10-CV-6301T(Fe) (W.D.N.Y. Jun. 9, 2010)

Opinion

10-CV-6301T(Fe).

June 9, 2010


DECISION AND ORDER


Plaintiff has requested permission to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and has met the statutory requirements. Accordingly, plaintiff's request to proceed as a poor person is hereby granted. The complaint has been reviewed by the Court with respect to the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) criteria.

There is insufficient information before the Court at this time to make the necessary assessment of plaintiff's claims under the standards promulgated by Hendricks v. Coughlin, 114 F.3d 390, 392 (2d Cir. 1997), and Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986), as issue has yet to be joined. Therefore plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice at this time.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to file plaintiff's papers, and to cause the United States Marshal to serve copies of the Summons, Complaint, and this Order upon the named defendants without plaintiff's payment therefor, unpaid fees to be recoverable if this action terminates by monetary award in plaintiff's favor.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bamann v. Patel

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jun 9, 2010
10-CV-6301T(Fe) (W.D.N.Y. Jun. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Bamann v. Patel

Case Details

Full title:DONALD P. BAMANN, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS PATEL, HINA PATEL and MICHAEL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Jun 9, 2010

Citations

10-CV-6301T(Fe) (W.D.N.Y. Jun. 9, 2010)