From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balter v. Ethyl Corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 8, 1980
386 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 78-1402.

July 8, 1980. Rehearing Denied September 8, 1980.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Francis X. Knuck, Judge.

Bailey Dawes and Guy B. Bailey, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Britton, Cohen, Kaufman, Zinkow, Benson Schantz and John L. Britton, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and SCHWARTZ, JJ.


The final order under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the underlying judgment upon which pre-judgment interest was sought and denied below is itself subject to reversal as to the defendant Ethyl Corporation, and, consequently, pre-judgment interest thereon was properly denied as to such defendant, Ethyl Corporation v. Balter, 386 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (case no. 78-994, opinion released this date), and (b) pre-judgment interest on the plaintiff Balter's claim for tortious interference with advantageous contractual relations against the defendants herein did not lie, in any event, because, in our view, neither test for the allowance of such interest established by Sullivan v. McMillan, 37 Fla. 134, 143-144, 19 So. 340, 343 (1896), was met in this case. Vacation Prizes, Inc. v. City National Bank of Miami Beach, 227 So.2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Balter v. Ethyl Corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 8, 1980
386 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Balter v. Ethyl Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BALTER, APPELLANT, v. ETHYL CORPORATION, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 8, 1980

Citations

386 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Burger King Corporation v. H H Restaurants

See Ford, 260 F.3d at 1294 n. 9. Burger King was privileged to refuse to consent to the sale even if its…