From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balmuccino, LLC v. Starbucks Corp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 21, 2023
22-cv-1501 JHC (W.D. Wash. Feb. 21, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-1501 JHC

02-21-2023

BALMUCCINO, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

JOHN H. CHUN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. # 12. The Court has considered the materials submitted in support of the motion, as well as the balance of the case file and the applicable law.

Apparently, Plaintiff attempted to respond to the motion by filing a First Amended Complaint. Dkt. # 15. But that pleading was filed one court day after the deadline for doing so. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the First Amended Complaint.

The motion to dismiss appears to have merit. And technically, it is unopposed. But on this record-i.e., the missing of a deadline by one court day-the Court does not believe it is in the interest of justice to dismiss the matter with prejudice. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion and DISMISSES this matter without prejudice. Plaintiff may move for leave to file an amended complaint; Plaintiff must do so by Thursday, March 2, 2023.


Summaries of

Balmuccino, LLC v. Starbucks Corp.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 21, 2023
22-cv-1501 JHC (W.D. Wash. Feb. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Balmuccino, LLC v. Starbucks Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BALMUCCINO, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Feb 21, 2023

Citations

22-cv-1501 JHC (W.D. Wash. Feb. 21, 2023)