From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ballard v. Reed

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Oct 23, 2007
NO. 4:07cv00076 GTE-HLJ (E.D. Ark. Oct. 23, 2007)

Opinion

NO. 4:07cv00076 GTE-HLJ.

October 23, 2007


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition received from Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones and the objections filed in response, and has further reviewed the relevant record de novo. The Findings and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings.

Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 45) be, and it is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint be, and it is hereby, DISMISSED without prejudice to re-file after exhaustion of his available remedies, and that this dismissal should be considered a "strike" within the meaning of the PLRA.

This dismissal is considered a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, which provides that a prisoner may not file a pro se civil rights action or appeal if the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions, filed an action or appeal that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious or for failure to state a claim, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ballard v. Reed

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Oct 23, 2007
NO. 4:07cv00076 GTE-HLJ (E.D. Ark. Oct. 23, 2007)
Case details for

Ballard v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:ABYSSINIA BALLARD PLAINTIFF ADC #134308 v. DALE REED, et al DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Oct 23, 2007

Citations

NO. 4:07cv00076 GTE-HLJ (E.D. Ark. Oct. 23, 2007)

Citing Cases

Massey v. Jones

The complaint does not allege that he was a member of a protected class, that he was deprived of a…