From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ballard v. Castilea

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Amarillo Division
Nov 29, 2005
No. 2:05-CV-0080 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2005)

Opinion

No. 2:05-CV-0080.

November 29, 2005


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL


Plaintiff DODSON LUGENE BALLARD, proceeding pro se and while a prisoner, has filed suit pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 1983 complaining against the above named defendants.

On October 26, 2005, the Court issued a Notice of Deficiency Order giving plaintiff thirty days in which to submit a six-month history of his inmate account certified as to accuracy by prison officials, commonly called an I.F.P. Data Sheet. Plaintiff was informed this document was available through his unit law library and that a failure to comply with the Court's Order would lead to dismissal of this suit.

On November 4, 2005, plaintiff filed a responsive pleading entitled "Plaintiff Ballard Airing Remedy Notice of Deficiency." By this document, plaintiff refers the Court to "Exhibit A D.L.B. 900820 T.D.C.J. II, Plaintiff's Declaration of Inability to Pay Cost" attached to his March 9, 2005 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis which, plaintiff argues, is sufficient under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff's response makes clear that he intends to stand on his pleadings and will not provide the form required by the Court. Moreover, the fact that plaintiff provided the necessary disclosure with respect to his cause no. 2:04-CV-0304 indicates he understands the Notice of Deficiency Order. The "Exhibit A D.L.B. 900820 T.D.C.J. II, Plaintiff's Declaration of Inability to Pay Cost" to which plaintiff refers is not a six-month history of his inmate trust account certified by prison officials as accurate and does not comply with the disclosure requirement of Title 28, United States Code, section 1915(a)(2).

The response period has expired, and plaintiff has refused to comply with the Court's October 26, 2005 Notice of Deficiency Order and has failed to provide the necessary financial disclosure to allow consideration of his request to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

The referral of the instant cause to the United States Magistrate Judge is hereby withdrawn.

This Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER TO PROVIDE STATUTORILY-MANDATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

The Clerk will mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff and to any attorney of record by first class mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ballard v. Castilea

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Amarillo Division
Nov 29, 2005
No. 2:05-CV-0080 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2005)
Case details for

Ballard v. Castilea

Case Details

Full title:DODSON LUGENE BALLARD, PRO SE, TDCJ-CID No. 900820, Plaintiff, v. NFN…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Amarillo Division

Date published: Nov 29, 2005

Citations

No. 2:05-CV-0080 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2005)