Ball v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha

Full title: BARCLAY BALL, Respondent, v. NIPPON YUSEN (KABUSHIKI) KAISHA and CANADIAN…

Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1932

143 Misc. 243 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)

256 N.Y.S. 298

Opinion

March 25, 1932.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, New York county.

Hardin, Hess Eder [Harold B. Elgar and Frank Rashap of counsel], for appellant Canadian Pacific Railway Company.

Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark Hupper [Ray Rood Allen and Burton H. White of counsel], for the appellant Nippon Yusen Kaisha.

Single Single [Gregory S. Rivkins and Frank H. Gerrodette of counsel], for the respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Brown v. Canadian Pacific R. Co. ( 143 Misc. 239), decided herewith.

LEVY, J.

I concur in result for reasons indicated by me in Baltimore Pub. Co. v. Swedish-Am. Mex. Line, Ltd. ( 143 Misc. 229), decided herewith.

CALLAHAN, J.

I concur for reasons stated by me in Brown v. Canadian Pacific R. Co. ( 143 Misc. 239), and Baltimore Pub. Co. v. Swedish-Am. Mex. Line, Ltd. (Id. 229), decided herewith.