From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balint v. Kalita

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 5, 1934
174 A. 740 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Submitted May 25th, 1934.

Decided October 5th, 1934.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the decree should be reversed, the decree is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

Mr. Samuel S. Cohen and Mr. G. George Goldman, for the appellants.

Mr. Stephen F. Somogyi, for the respondents.


The decree under review is affirmed, by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, BODINE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 7.

For reversal — PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, KAYS, JJ. 7.


Summaries of

Balint v. Kalita

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 5, 1934
174 A. 740 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Balint v. Kalita

Case Details

Full title:ANTON BALINT and ELIZABETH BALINT, complainants-respondents, v. FRED…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 5, 1934

Citations

174 A. 740 (N.J. 1934)
174 A. 740