From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baldwin v. Redden

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jun 27, 2013
NO. 02-12-00520-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 02-12-00520-CV

06-27-2013

BELINDA BALDWIN AND AMERICAN CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC. APPELLANTS v. R.W. REDDEN APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On May 1, 2013, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellants' brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Baldwin v. Redden

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jun 27, 2013
NO. 02-12-00520-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Baldwin v. Redden

Case Details

Full title:BELINDA BALDWIN AND AMERICAN CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC. APPELLANTS v. R.W…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jun 27, 2013

Citations

NO. 02-12-00520-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2013)