From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bakersfield Kern Electric Railway Co. v. Hay

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Dec 31, 1915
29 Cal.App. 793 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1933.

December 31, 1915.

APPLICATION for a writ of mandate.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Bakersfield Kern Electric Ry. Co. v. Hay, ante, p. 289.

Short Sutherland, and Borton Theile, for Petitioner.

E. F. Brittan, and Walter Osborn, for Respondents.


In response to an alternative writ issued herein, the respondents have filed a general demurrer. The facts are the same and the questions presented for decision are the same as in Bakersfield Kern Electric Ry. Co. v. Hay (Civil No. 1934), ante, p. 289 [ 155 P. 132], petition for writ of prohibition, in which decision has been filed this day. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the demurrer is sustained and the application for peremptory writ of mandate herein is denied.


Summaries of

Bakersfield Kern Electric Railway Co. v. Hay

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Dec 31, 1915
29 Cal.App. 793 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915)
Case details for

Bakersfield Kern Electric Railway Co. v. Hay

Case Details

Full title:BAKERSFIELD KERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner, v…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Dec 31, 1915

Citations

29 Cal.App. 793 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915)
155 P. 134