From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 25, 2002
826 So. 2d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-4143

Opinion filed September 25, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; James I. Cohn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-11077 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, and Edward Baker, Indiantown, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Edward Baker timely challenges the trial court's denial of his rule 3.850(a) motion for postconviction relief. Baker raised five issues in his motion. Two issues were summarily denied, and three were resolved following an evidentiary hearing.

Baker's claim that counsel failed to obtain a fingerprint analysis is legally sufficient. Baker claims that such investigation would have revealed that his fingerprints were not present at the scene before or during the time of the crime.

We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing with respect to this issue. The trial court properly denied Baker's remaining claims.

FARMER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Baker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 25, 2002
826 So. 2d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Baker v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 25, 2002

Citations

826 So. 2d 524 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Ward v. State

See Evans v. State, 737 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). The claim is legally sufficient as indicated in Baker…

Cowan v. State

Because the record does not conclusively refute Cowan's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to…