From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Or. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 15, 2018
2:17-cv-0272-TC (D. Or. May. 15, 2018)

Opinion

2:17-cv-0272-TC

05-15-2018

ERNEST BAKER, Plaintiff, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ODOC; & STUART YOUNG, Assistant Administrator of Religious Services, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 38), and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Defendants filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 38) is adopted in full. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's kosher diet claims and claims not raised in No. DC-EOCI-2016-01-055 and DENIED with respect to plaintiff's remaining claims. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 15th day of May, 2018.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Baker v. Or. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 15, 2018
2:17-cv-0272-TC (D. Or. May. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Baker v. Or. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST BAKER, Plaintiff, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ODOC; …

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 15, 2018

Citations

2:17-cv-0272-TC (D. Or. May. 15, 2018)