Baker v. Lilly

Full title: James K. Baker, Plaintiff, v. Robert Lilly, et al., Defendants, and James…

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 12, 2006

Case Nos. 2:06-cv-0606, 2:06-cv-0607 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 12, 2006)

Opinion

Case Nos. 2:06-cv-0606, 2:06-cv-0607.

October 12, 2006

ORDER

TERENCE KEMP, Magistrate Judge

Defendants have moved to consolidate these two cases on grounds that they involve the same parties and the same common set of facts. Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition. The Court agrees that the cases are appropriate for consolidation and grants the motion (#9 in Case No. 2:06-cv-606 and #12 in Case No. 2:06-cv-607). These cases are consolidated under Case No. 2:06-cv-606 (Judge Watson; Magistrate Judge King).