From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Jordon

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 12, 1959
263 F.2d 741 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

Summary

In Baker v. Jordon, 3 Ohio St. 438, it was held that a growing crop of corn might be reserved by parol from the operation of a deed for the land whereon it grows.

Summary of this case from Bristow v. Carriger

Opinion

No. 14570.

Argued January 29, 1959.

Decided February 12, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Charles F. McLaughlin, Judge.

Mr. Julius W. Robertson, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Bruce R. Harrison and Mrs. Dovey J. Roundtree, Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for appellant.

Mr. Thomas J. Ahern, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, BAZELON and FAHY, Circuit Judges.


The plaintiff in a suit for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the defendant's negligent operation of an automobile appeals from a judgment for the defendant based on a jury verdict. We find no error.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Baker v. Jordon

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 12, 1959
263 F.2d 741 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

In Baker v. Jordon, 3 Ohio St. 438, it was held that a growing crop of corn might be reserved by parol from the operation of a deed for the land whereon it grows.

Summary of this case from Bristow v. Carriger
Case details for

Baker v. Jordon

Case Details

Full title:Raymond BAKER, Appellant, v. Jesse JORDON, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 1959

Citations

263 F.2d 741 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

Bristow v. Carriger

The Supreme Court held the evidence properly admissible, that the reservation was a good one, and operated as…