Baker v. Echostar Communications Corp.

Full title: SHARON R. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 19, 2008

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01103-ZLW-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 19, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01103-ZLW-BNB.

March 19, 2008

ORDER

ZITA WEINSHIENK, Senior District Judge

Because the ten-day time limit for filing post-trial motions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 is jurisdictional, and cannot be extended by the Court,¹ it is

1 See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b)(2); Allender v. Raytheon Aircraft Co., 439 F.3d 1236, 1241 (10th Cir. 2006); Weitz v. Lovelace Health Sys., Inc., 214 F.3d 1175, 1179 (10th Cir. 2000); Fairway Center Corp. v. U.I.P Corp., 491 F.2d 1092 (8th Cir. 1974); Weissman v. Dawn Joy Fashions, Inc., 214 F.3d 224, 230 (2nd Cir. 2000).

ORDERED that the Minute Order filed March 18, 2008, (Doc. No. 199) granting Plaintiff's Motion For Extension Of Time To Submit Post-Trial Motions Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 hereby is vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion For Extension Of Time To Submit Post-Trial Motions Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 is denied.