From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Bolling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-cv-389-TM-N (S.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-cv-389-TM-N

11-30-2018

SIDNEY JAMES BAKER, AIS #00199075, Petitioner, v. LEON BOLLING, Warden, Fountain Correctional Facility, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered on this date, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Respondent and against Petitioner Sidney James Baker, such that this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Further, the Court determines that Baker is not entitled to a Certificate of Appealability and therefore is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED this the 30th day of November 2018.

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Baker v. Bolling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-cv-389-TM-N (S.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Baker v. Bolling

Case Details

Full title:SIDNEY JAMES BAKER, AIS #00199075, Petitioner, v. LEON BOLLING, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-cv-389-TM-N (S.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2018)