From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baker v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
May 4, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-405 (S.D. Ohio May. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-405.

May 4, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 15), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on May 3, 2010, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision that Plaintiff is not disabled and therefore not entitled to benefits under the Social Security Act be, and it hereby is, affirmed.


Summaries of

Baker v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
May 4, 2010
Case No. 3:09-cv-405 (S.D. Ohio May. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Baker v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM D. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: May 4, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-405 (S.D. Ohio May. 4, 2010)