From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BAK v. BAK

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 19, 2007
947 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 4D06-1348.

January 10, 2007. Rehearing Denied February 19, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ronald J. Rothschild and Jack Tuter, Judges; L.T. Case No. 99-16808 4290.

Itzhak Bak, Dania Beach, pro se.

No brief filed on behalf of appellee.


Affirmed. The former husband appeals from an order of contempt. He has failed to present a transcript of proceedings, and thus the appropriateness of the sanctions in the order cannot be addressed, nor can the issue raised with respect to the admissibility of evidence. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). With respect to his claim that the order requires immediate incarceration upon future non-compliance, the order of contempt contains no such mandatory language. All the trial judge did was express a hope that a successor judge would incarcerate the appellant in the event that he were subsequently found to have violated the terms of the final judgment.

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

BAK v. BAK

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 19, 2007
947 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

BAK v. BAK

Case Details

Full title:Itzhak BAK, Appellant, v. Joyce BAK, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 19, 2007

Citations

947 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Knox v. PPC, LLC

Because Appellants have failed to provide an adequate record on appeal, we are unable to review the finding…