From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baird v. Winstead

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1898
31 S.E. 390 (N.C. 1898)

Opinion

(Decided 9 November, 1898.)

Wills — Dower.

1. An estate for life to the widow of the son of testator, conditional upon the death of the son without issue, is defeated by his death, leaving issue.

2. The son of a testator having acquired the land and intermarried with the plaintiff prior to 1860, she is barred by right of dower, by the sale of the land to the defendants, during his life, by his assignee in bankruptcy.

CIVIL ACTION to recover land, tried before Robinson, J., at April Term, 1898, of the Superior Court of PERSON County.

The plaintiff Lucy Baird, widow of Thomas A. Baird, claimed a life estate in the land under the will of William Baird, father of her husband, dated in 1856. Her marriage occurred prior to 1860 and the title of her husband under the same will vested prior to 1860. His interest was sold during his lifetime at sale in bankruptcy, and purchased by defendants, who claim under the assignee's deed.

His Honor decided that the plaintiff, upon the death of her husband, leaving issue, was not entitled to any life estate in the land, and the plaintiff submitted to a nonsuit and appealed.

The clauses of the will of William Baird relied upon by the plaintiff are recited in the opinion.

Winston Fuller for plaintiff (appellant). (182)

J. W. Graham for defendants.


Clause 5 of the will gives the residue of the estate absolutely "to be equally divided" between the testator's six sons, therein named, Thomas being one of them. In clause 7 there is a condition or defeasance, "should my son Thomas die without leaving issue, then I desire that his share as above shall be equally divided among his brothers, and if any of his brothers be then dead, the children of the dead brothers shall take their dead father's share; if, however, Thomas should leave a widow, I desire her to have the use of the property during her life or widowhood." The estate of Thomas was absolute unless defeated by his dying without issue, and only if thus defeated did the reservation of a life estate to the widow take effect as a limitation upon Thomas' entire share going to his brothers. Should he die leaving issue, it was evidently contemplated (The Code, sec. 2180) that the estate should go in usual course unless devised or sold by him, to his issue with the right of dower in his wife. Thomas died leaving issue, and the only contingency in which the widow could claim a life estate in the property has not arisen. The defendants hold the realty under purchase at a sale thereof by the assignee in bankruptcy of Thomas, who intermarried with the plaintiff and also acquired the land prior to 1860. She is, therefore, also barred of right of dower therein. Sutton v. Askew, 66 N.C. 172. In holding that the plaintiff could not recover, there was

No error.

Cited: Sain v. Baker, 128 N.C. 258; Whitfield v. Garris, 134 N.C. 32.

(183)


Summaries of

Baird v. Winstead

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1898
31 S.E. 390 (N.C. 1898)
Case details for

Baird v. Winstead

Case Details

Full title:LUCY BAIRD v. C. S. WINSTEAD

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1898

Citations

31 S.E. 390 (N.C. 1898)
123 N.C. 181

Citing Cases

Whitfield v. Garris

The other questions discussed by the court in those cases are not material in this connection and do not…

Sain v. Baker

It was uncontradicted evidence that J. Wesley Leonhardt died before his wife (who was the only wife he ever…