From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite v. The City of Bainbridge Island

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 9, 2023
3:22-cv-05491-TL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 9, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-05491-TL

02-09-2023

BAINBRIDGE TAXPAYERS UNITE, a Washington non-profit corporation; LEE ROSENBAUM, an individual; and JANICE PYKE, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, a municipal corporation.; KOLBY MEDINA, an individual; MORGAN SMITH, an individual; COATES DESIGN, INC., a Washington corporation; JOSEPH LEVAN, an individual; and JOHN and JANE DOES 1-100, other unknown individuals or legal entities who participated in the complained of conducts, Defendants.

BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation Bradley P. Thoreson, Alexandra M. Shulman, Joshua M. Robbins Attorneys for Plaintiffs PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP Jessica A. Skelton, Shweta Jayawardhan, Attorneys for Defendants City of Bainbridge, Kolby Medina, Morgan Smith, and Joseph Levan CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN, P.S. Lindsey M. Pflugrath, Stephen P. VanDerhoef, Attorneys for Defendant Coates Design, Inc.


BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation Bradley P. Thoreson, Alexandra M. Shulman, Joshua M. Robbins Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP Jessica A. Skelton, Shweta Jayawardhan, Attorneys for Defendants City of Bainbridge, Kolby Medina, Morgan Smith, and Joseph Levan

CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN, P.S. Lindsey M. Pflugrath, Stephen P. VanDerhoef, Attorneys for Defendant Coates Design, Inc.

STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Tana Lin United States District Judge

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs and Defendants submit this stipulated motion and [proposed] order to extend Plaintiffs' deadline to file a response to Defendants The City of Bainbridge Island, Kolby Medina, and Morgan Smith's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint and Defendant Coates Design, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and Joinder in the Motion to Dismiss by the City of Bainbridge Island, Medina, and Smith. It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants that Plaintiffs will file its Response on March 13, 2023; and Defendants will file their replies on March 31, 2023.

We certify that this memorandum contains 94 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules.

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the Parties' Stipulation (Dkt. No. 40) to Extend Plaintiffs' Deadline to Respond to Defendants The City of Bainbridge Island, Kolby Medina, and Morgan Smith's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint and Defendant Coates Design, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and Joinder in the Motion to Dismiss by the City of Bainbridge Island, Medina, and Smith.

It is hereby STIPULATED and AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants that Plaintiffs will file its Response on March 13, 2023; and Defendants will file their replies on March 31, 2023.


Summaries of

Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite v. The City of Bainbridge Island

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 9, 2023
3:22-cv-05491-TL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Bainbridge Taxpayers Unite v. The City of Bainbridge Island

Case Details

Full title:BAINBRIDGE TAXPAYERS UNITE, a Washington non-profit corporation; LEE…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Feb 9, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-05491-TL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 9, 2023)